- HANDBREAK INTEL POWER GADGET MP4
- HANDBREAK INTEL POWER GADGET FULL
- HANDBREAK INTEL POWER GADGET SOFTWARE
- HANDBREAK INTEL POWER GADGET PLUS
Generally, the slower you go, you'll end up with a higher quality result and a smaller filesize, but the video will be more difficult to encode, taking longer, and more difficult to decode as well.
Encoder presets change a lot of settings in the background.
You can generally get away with a higher (as in higher numerical value) RF/CQ setting here.Ĥ. There's a lot less fine details to consider. Side note about anime: anime is generally much simpler to encode/decode than anything live action because the video is just simpler. This should produce a result with consistent quality without fucky artifacts when something blows up, while allowing the resulting filesize to be smaller because you didn't have 8000kbps for every mundane scene in the movie. This doesn't matter to RF/CQ values as they attempt to keep the quality consistent based on the value you chose, allowing the bitrate to rise when needed and fall when not needed. On the other hand, you may need more than 8000kbps during scenes where there's a lot going on, such as a racing/chasing scene, or an explosion. You may not need 8000kbps during a scene where there's not much going on, such as a few characters just talking to each other without much changes in the background. If you encode with a bitrate target instead, for example 8000kbps, you'll be getting close to 8000kbps all the time. RF/CQ values are smart and control the quality of the resulting video based on the RF/CQ target value.
HANDBREAK INTEL POWER GADGET FULL
Two full passes simply took too much time for the tiny amount of image quality improvement.
HANDBREAK INTEL POWER GADGET SOFTWARE
I figure some video engineer could pick apart each and say what's good/bad about each but for my mundane purposes, all four hardware encoding technologies were adequate at least when I tried this sometime in 2020.īack when Handbrake didn't offer the VideoToolbox Mac support, I used software encoding (H.265 10-bit) and did 2-Pass Encoding, Turbo First Pass.
HANDBREAK INTEL POWER GADGET PLUS
I did identical transcodes on all four (three Windows PCs plus the Mac's VideoToolbox encoder) and I thought they all gave acceptable output. I know there are hardware encoders for Intel CPUs (Quicksync), Nvidia (NVEnc), and AMD (I forgot what it's called, VCE/VCN I think). My Kodi media player (a Raspberry Pi 4) can handle.
HANDBREAK INTEL POWER GADGET MP4
mp4 container since so they can be synced to my iPhone and iPad if desired the native media players don't accept. I currently use the H.265 10-bit (VideoToolbox) encoder setting which harnesses the hardware encoder in the Mac's T2 Security Chip. What else can i change/modify to improve space/time/quality ? Occasionaly (but rarely) i get a file that is larger than the original, which is strange since the original is like. It mostly does the job done, though there is always room for improvement. Other settings i leave at default since i dont know their effect. I tend to batch load the whole folder to save time. Could i go even lower, like 23 fps to save space, without noticing much ?) Right now the settings i am using are this:ĥ) original fps - variable (changing this to variable 25 fps now since otherwise at some vids it crashes. Some are from torrents, some downloaded from tube type sites, some are high quality, some extremely low quality, resolutions from 320x240 to full hd. Im using a very old i5 2500K and i encode during the night when electricity is cheaper. I am looking for some tips to further improve speed/space/quality, or a link to a guide and i will do the work myself. Its mostly smut movies or some other videos where quality is not that important, you just want it stored. Hello, i have a large amount of files i am encoding to save space.
0 kommentar(er)
